25 Linearity by Synthesis: An Intrinsically Linear AlGaN/GaN-on-Si Transistor with OIP3/(F-1)PDC of 10.1 at 30 GHz

By Woojin Choi1; Venkatesh Balasubramanian2; Peter M. Asbeck1; Shadi Dayeh1

1. Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego 2. Maury Microwave Corporation, Ontario, California

Published on

Abstract

Introduction: In today’s radio-frequency (RF) systems, linearity of amplifiers is a key concern due to presence of significant numbers of in-band interferers in the crowded spectrum. GaN high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) can provide low noise front-end amplifiers, but state-of-the-art GaN HEMTs still possess non-linearity exhibited by a transconductance, gm, roll-off from its peak due to the dynamic source access resistance and other factors [1]. The dynamic range figure-of-merit (DRFOM) for low noise amplifiers (LNAs) [2], OIP3/(F-1)PDC, where OIP3 is the output 3rd-order intercept point (OIP3), PDC is the DC power, and F is the noise factor, is still limited to ~1.7 in mm-wave GaN transistors [3]. Joglekar et al. attempted to increase linearity by using different Fin widths resulted in flat gm of ~2 V [1]; linearity figures of merit were not properly assessed. Here, we demonstrate a novel method to synthesize gm plateau over a 6 V gate overdrive and a record DRFOM of 10.1 in GaN HEMTs at 30 GHz.

Experiment and Device Design: The metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) structure incorporates a planar FET in parallel with a set of fin FETs. A commercial Al0.23Ga0.77N/GaN-on-Si wafer was used without additional epitaxial layer growth. An alloyed Ti/Al-based Ohmic contact was used and Fin structures were formed by e-beam lithography and dry etching. Fin widths (WFin) were varied from 50 nm to 200 nm, and fin length (LFin), gap between Fins (Wgap), and mesa width (WM) were fixed at 150 nm, 200 nm, and 20 μm, respectively. A 6 nm-thick Al2O3 was deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD), and a Ti/Au gate metal was evaporated. After opening ohmic windows, Ti/Au pads and Si3N4 passivation layers were deposited. The gate-to-source (LGS), gate-to-drain distances (LGD), and a gate length (LG) were 0.5 μm, 1.35 μm, and 90 nm, respectively. Figure 1 shows the cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the fabricated Fin metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) structure.

In Fin MIS-HEMTs, as shown in Figure 2, threshold voltages (VT) shift in positive direction with decreasing WFin, because of the tri-gate structure [4]. For a device composed of a planar and several Fin channels, termed a synthesized device, ID can be expressed as: ID,total (VGS) = a0ID,0(VGS - VT,0) + a1ID,1(VGS-VT,1) + ⋯ + ak ID,k (VGS - Vt,k), where ak is the weight of kth channels for a family of Fins with a width, WFin,k, and a threshold voltage, VT,k. k=0 represents the planar device characteristics. We chose 4 different WFin of 160, 100, 80, and 50 nm to linearize the transfer characteristic of the planar device. As shown in Figure 3, we exploited gm' for the selected WFin and computed ak to obtain a wide zero gm' window for VGS from -4 V to 2 V. Figure 4 shows a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the fabricated synthesized device. Figure 5(a) and (b) are the linearized transfer characteristic showing a gm plateau of ~6 V and the output characteristics, respectively. Figure 6 shows measured gm and its derivatives with multiple gm" sweet spots.

LNA Performance at 30 GHz The planar-Fin synthesis design was adapted to another device with 8-fingers, 90 nm T-gates, a shorter LGS of 250 nm, and LGD of 350 nm on the same die for mm-wave LNAs. The device was biased at VDS=3 V and ID=63 mA in the following single-tone continuous wave (CW) power sweep and two-tone linearity measurements at 30 GHz at Maury Microwave with the source and load impedances matched to Γin* and 0.17∠140°, respectively. As can be seen in Figure 7(a), the single-tone CW power sweep measurement shows maximum output power (Pout), linear gain, and peak power added efficiency (PAE) of 19.6 dBm, 7.52 dB, and 32.35%, respectively. Figure 7(b) shows the measured distortions to amplitude (AM-AM (|S21|)), and to phase (AM-PM (∡S21)). The output 1-dB gain compression point (P1dB) was as high as 17.8 dBm. The AM-PM distortion was only 0.3 degree at P1dB. As shown in Figure 8(a), the input 3rd-order intercept point (IIP3) of 23.5 dBm and OIP3 of 31 dBm were extrapolated at a PDC of 189 mW. The ratio of carrier-to-IM3 (C/IM3) was above 45 dBc at Pin per tone of 0 dBm. On-wafer noise measurement was also carried out with frequencies from 8 to 50 GHz. The minimum noise figure (NFmin) and the associated gain (Ga) are shown in Figure 8(b), and the NFmin was 2.2 dB at 30 GHz, resulting in the LNA FOM of 10.1. To the best of our knowledge, this value is the record in GaN-based devices.

Conclusion The concept of an intrinsically synthesizable linear device is demonstrated. It was implemented by changing only the device layout; additional performance gains can be attained by further materials engineering.

image

Credits

The authors acknowledge the support of Renjie Chen for TEM, nano3 and Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (CINT). This work was supported in part by an NSF-ECCS award #1711030.

References

  1. S. Joglekar et al., IEDM Tech. Dig., p. 613, (2017).
  2. V. Aparin et al., IEEE TMTT, p. 571, (2005).
  3. M. Micovic et al., CSICS Tech. Dig., p.1, (2016).
  4. J. Ma et al., IEEE TED, vol. 66, p. 4068, (2019).

Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  • Woojin Choi, Venkatesh Balasubramanian, Peter M. Asbeck, Shadi Dayeh (2020), "25 Linearity by Synthesis: An Intrinsically Linear AlGaN/GaN-on-Si Transistor with OIP3/(F-1)PDC of 10.1 at 30 GHz," https://nanohub.org/resources/34108.

    BibTex | EndNote

Time

Location

DRC 2020 Virtual Conference

Tags

Linearity by Synthesis: An Intrinsically Linear AlGaN/GaN-on-Si Transistor with OIP3/(F-1)PDC of 10.1 at 30 GHz
by: Woojin Choi, Venkatesh Balasubramanian, Peter M. Asbeck, Shadi Dayeh
  • Linearity by Synthesis: An Intrinsically Linear AlGaN/GaN-on-Si Transistor with OIP3/(F-1)PDC of 10.1 at 30 GHz 1. Linearity by Synthesis: An Int… 0
    00:00/00:00
  • Contents 2. Contents 40.306973640306978
    00:00/00:00
  • Needs and Significance: Amplifier Intermodulation and Linearity 3. Needs and Significance: Amplif… 76.876876876876878
    00:00/00:00
  • FET Transconductance (gm) 4. FET Transconductance (gm) 217.41741741741743
    00:00/00:00
  • gm Cancellation Approaches for Linearity: Circuit-Level 5. gm Cancellation Approaches for… 316.31631631631632
    00:00/00:00
  • An Intrinsically Linear Transistor 6. An Intrinsically Linear Transi… 370.4704704704705
    00:00/00:00
  • Device Structure and Process Flow 7. Device Structure and Process F… 427.92792792792795
    00:00/00:00
  • Individual Fin Device Characteristics 8. Individual Fin Device Characte… 480.21354688021358
    00:00/00:00
  • Fabricated Device Results with Varied WFin 9. Fabricated Device Results with… 513.14647981314647
    00:00/00:00
  • Synthesis of gm: 1) Calculate g'm Ratios and α's 10. Synthesis of gm: 1) Calculate … 551.317984651318
    00:00/00:00
  • Synthesis of gm: 2) Determine the Number of Fins and Device Design 11. Synthesis of gm: 2) Determine … 611.07774441107779
    00:00/00:00
  • Fabricated Synthesized Device Results: SEM Images 12. Fabricated Synthesized Device … 633.26659993326666
    00:00/00:00
  • Fabricated Synthesized Device Results: DC Characteristics 13. Fabricated Synthesized Device … 661.76176176176182
    00:00/00:00
  • Comparison with Conventional Device 14. Comparison with Conventional D… 674.84150817484158
    00:00/00:00
  • Comparison with Other Works 15. Comparison with Other Works 711.01101101101108
    00:00/00:00
  • Multi-Finger Synthesized Device Results 16. Multi-Finger Synthesized Devic… 723.923923923924
    00:00/00:00
  • 1-Tone Power Sweep, AM-AM and AM-PM 17. 1-Tone Power Sweep, AM-AM and … 780.980980980981
    00:00/00:00
  • 2-Tone Linearity and Noise Characteristics 18. 2-Tone Linearity and Noise Cha… 857.82449115782447
    00:00/00:00
  • Performance Comparison with Various Technologies 19. Performance Comparison with Va… 919.18585251918591
    00:00/00:00
  • Conclusions 20. Conclusions 962.36236236236243
    00:00/00:00
  • Acknowledgements 21. Acknowledgements 991.12445779112454
    00:00/00:00
  • Thank you 22. Thank you 1014.0473807140474
    00:00/00:00