Finite Difference Schemes for k.p Models: A Comparative Study

By Jun Huang1; Kuang-Chung Wang1; William R Frensley2; Gerhard Klimeck3

1. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 2. Electrical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 3. Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

View Presentation

Additional materials available (4)

Licensed under General Performance Usage.

Category

Online Presentations

Published on

Abstract

IWCE 2015 Presentation.

Sponsored by

IWCE 2015

Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  • Jun Huang, Kuang-Chung Wang, William R Frensley, Gerhard Klimeck (2016), "Finite Difference Schemes for k.p Models: A Comparative Study," https://nanohub.org/resources/25140.

    BibTex | EndNote

Time

Location

North Ballroom, PMU, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

Tags

  1. FDM
  2. finite difference methods
  3. IWCE 2015
  4. k.p models
  5. nanoelectronics
Finite Difference Schemes for k.p Models: A Comparative Study
  • Finite Difference Schemes for k.p Models: A Comparative Study 1. Finite Difference Schemes for … 0
    00:00/00:00
  • Outline 2. Outline 38.50517183850517
    00:00/00:00
  • K.P Method: An Brief Introduction 3. K.P Method: An Brief Introduct… 102.06873540206874
    00:00/00:00
  • Why K.P Method and Why Finite Difference ? 4. Why K.P Method and Why Finite … 195.36202869536203
    00:00/00:00
  • Problem: Spurious Solutions 5. Problem: Spurious Solutions 284.2842842842843
    00:00/00:00
  • Spurious Solution 1: Material Parameters 6. Spurious Solution 1: Material … 305.8391725058392
    00:00/00:00
  • Spurious Solution 2: Discretization 7. Spurious Solution 2: Discretiz… 360.82749416082748
    00:00/00:00
  • Spurious Solution 3: Material Interface 8. Spurious Solution 3: Material … 416.64998331665
    00:00/00:00
  • Challenge: 8-Band Model for Heterostructures 9. Challenge: 8-Band Model for He… 477.04371037704374
    00:00/00:00
  • Comparative Study: Four Combinations 10. Comparative Study: Four Combin… 524.32432432432438
    00:00/00:00
  • Q1: Which one gives good E-k diagram? 11. Q1: Which one gives good E-k d… 600.10010010010012
    00:00/00:00
  • Q2: Which one is numerically stable? 12. Q2: Which one is numerically s… 653.62028695362028
    00:00/00:00
  • Q3: Which one has well-behaviored WF? 13. Q3: Which one has well-behavio… 700.83416750083416
    00:00/00:00
  • Q4: Is the implementation tricky? 14. Q4: Is the implementation tric… 768.13480146813481
    00:00/00:00
  • Conclusion 15. Conclusion 847.81448114781449
    00:00/00:00
  • Acknowledgement 16. Acknowledgement 890.9242575909243
    00:00/00:00
Pop Out