effective mass
I was simulating a rectangular nanowire with the default parameters. It generated extremely small (0.0001) effective masses for band 1 valley 1. Please have a look. Also, we need to have the density of states calculated.
effective mass
I was simulating a rectangular nanowire with the default parameters. It generated extremely small (0.0001) effective masses for band 1 valley 1. Please have a look. Also, we need to have the density of states calculated.
The table below shows the current "market value" of the question and estimated amount of points that you can earn, when the question is closed.
Points Breakdown | points | Details |
---|---|---|
* Activity points are calculated based on summing up the weighted number of answers, recommendations and answer votes. Read further details. | ||
Activity* | 0 | |
Bonus | 50 | |
Total market value | 0 | total |
Asker will earn | 0 | 1/3 of activity points |
Asker will pay | 50 | Reward for best answer assigned by asker |
Best answer may earn | 0 | Up to 2/3 of activity points plus the bonus |
3 Like 1 Dislike
Abhijeet Paul @ on
Thanks for letting us know this. Presently there are some issues in the effective mass calculation and these results come because of the erraneous calculation procedure.
Reply Report abuse
Please login to answer the question.
4 Like 1 Dislike
Abhijeet Paul @ on
Could you please increase the number of k-points and then resimulate the structure. Keep Nk say 101 points and then simulate. This will help in giving a better initial guess for obtaining the effective mass at a given E and K. Rest we are fixing this issue to make the solution more robust.
Reply Report abuse
Please login to answer the question.
0 Like 0 Dislike
Jose Pablo Arrieta @ on
I had a similar problem but I used more k points until it eventually worked fine, at least for me.
Hope you can fix your problem soon.
Reply Report abuse
Please login to answer the question.
1 Like 0 Dislike
Anonymous @ on
I had a similar problem but I used more k points until it eventually worked fine, at least for me.
Hope you can fix your problem soon.
Reply Report abuse
Please login to answer the question.
0 Like 0 Dislike
Anonymous @ on
I had a similar problem but I used more k points until it eventually worked fine, at least for me.
Hope you can fix your problem soon.
Reply Report abuse
Please login to answer the question.
0 Like 0 Dislike
Anonymous @ on
I had a similar problem but I used more k points until it eventually worked fine, at least for me.
Hope you can fix your problem soon.
Reply Report abuse
Please login to answer the question.
0 Like 0 Dislike
Anonymous @ on
I had a similar problem but I used more k points until it eventually worked fine, at least for me.
Hope you can fix your problem soon.
Reply Report abuse
Please login to answer the question.
0 Like 0 Dislike
Anonymous @ on
I had a similar problem but I used more k points until it eventually worked fine, at least for me.
Hope you can fix your problem soon.
Reply Report abuse
Please login to answer the question.