Online Simulation

And More

Top 25 Tags (all tags)

  1. algorithms
  2. carbon nanotubes
  3. circuits
  4. course lecture
  5. cyberinfrastructure
  6. devices
  7. education/outreach
  8. experiments
  9. material science
  10. molecular electronics
  11. nano/bio
  12. nanobio applications
  13. nano electro-mechanical systems
  14. nanoelectronics
  15. nanomedicine
  16. nanophotonics
  17. nano-transistors
  18. nanowires
  19. NEGF
  20. quantum dots
  21. research seminar
  22. SURI
  23. tutorial
  24. uIllinois
  25. uiuc

Other

Trouble Report

For immediate assistance browse through our support center. You can find answers to many questions in just a few minutes.

If still experiencing problems, send us a report.

Sending report ...

BioSensorLab

This resource has a 8.4 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Last 12 Months: Updated 16 May, 2008 more ›
Users: 41
Jobs: 286
Avg. exec. time: 14 secs
Reviews & Citations
Google/IEEE
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 0

0 reviews (Review this)

0 citations

Launch Tool

You must log in before you can run this tool.

Supporting Documents

Contributor(s) Pradeep R. Nair, Muhammad A. Alam
Purdue University, West Lafayette
At a glance BioSensorLab is a tool to evaluate and predict the performance of biosensors.
Screenshots
  • Screenshot #1
  • Screenshot #2
Description

BioSensorLab is a tool to evaluate and predict the performance parameters of a label-free, electronic biosensor (see figure). The sensor basically consist of a field effect device, whose surface is functionalized with capture probe (receptor) molecules. Some of the target molecules, which are introduced to the system, diffuse through the solution and reach the field effect device and get captured by the receptors thereby binding them close to the surface. Many bio-molecules carry an electrostatic charge under normal physiological conditions. For example, DNA is negatively charged while the net charge of a protein molecule depends on the pH of the solution. The coulomb interaction between the charge of the target bio-molecule and the field effect device can result in a change in conductivity of the latter.

The response of a sensor is characterized in terms of its Settling time, Sensitivity and Selectivity. The time taken by the sensor to produce a stable signal change defines the settling time. It is determined by bio-molecule concentration, their diffusion coefficients, and their conjugation affinity to the receptor molecules. Sensitivity corresponds to the relative change in sensor characteristics upon attachment of target molecules on nanowire surface. This is determined mainly by the electrostatics of the system. Finally, Selectivity denotes the ability of receptors to bind with the desired target in the presence of various other (possibly similar) biomolecules and is entirely determined by the functionalizing schemes. For example, to detect DNA, Peptide Nucleic Acid (PNA) receptors are shown to be more selective than their DNA counterparts.

The performance parameters of nanobiosensors (Settling time, Sensitivity and Selectivity) can be estimated using this tool. The theoretical model is based on self-consistent solutions of Diffusion-Capture model (for the time response), Poisson-Boltzmann and Drift-Diffusion Equations (for electrolyte screening and conductance modulation) and the statistical properties of bio-molecule adsorption (Selectivity). However, ONLY the SETTLING TIME module is released for public domain right now and the rest will be made available shortly.

Prof. Alam's lecture on Geometry of Diffusion and the Performance Limits of Nanobiosensors provides an overview on the Diffusion-Capture model and its implications on sensor performance.

Sponsored by

National Institute of Health (NIH).
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN).

References

Settling Time:
P. R. Nair and M. A. Alam, "Dimensionally Frustrated Diffusion towards Fractal Adsorbers," Physical Review Letters, 99, 256101 (2007).
P. R. Nair and M. A. Alam, "Performance Limits of Nanobiosensors," Applied Physics Letters, 88, 233120 (2006).

Sensitivity:
P. R. Nair and M. A. Alam, "Screening-Limited Response of Nanobiosensors," Nano Letters, (2008).
P. R. Nair and M. A. Alam, "Design Considerations of Silicon Nanowire Biosensors," IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 54, 3400 (2007).

Cite this work

If you reference this work in a publication, please cite as follows:

    P. R. Nair and M. A. Alam, Physical Review Letters, 99, 256101 (2007).
    P. R. Nair and M. A. Alam, Applied Physics Letters, 88, 233120 (2006).

  • Nair, Pradeep R.; Alam, Muhammad A. (2008), "BioSensorLab", http://www.nanohub.org/tools/senstran/, accessed on 2008-05-17 02:20:34.

    BibTex | EndNote

In addition, we would appreciate it if you would add the following acknowledgment to your publication:

  • Simulation services for results presented here were provided by the Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) at nanoHUB.org

Version released 31 Mar, 2008
Type Tools
Tags

Citations

The following are publications that have cited this resource, separated by their affiliation to the NCN.

No citations found.

Reviews

The following are reviews of this resource from other site members.

Write a review

No reviews found. Be the first to review this resource!

Related Questions & Answers

The following are questions related to this tool that were posted by other users in our questions and answers forum.

Ask a question about this tool

No questions found.