Online Simulation

And More

Top 25 Tags (all tags)

  1. algorithms
  2. carbon nanotubes
  3. circuits
  4. course lecture
  5. cyberinfrastructure
  6. devices
  7. education/outreach
  8. experiments
  9. material science
  10. molecular electronics
  11. nano/bio
  12. nanobio applications
  13. nano electro-mechanical systems
  14. nanoelectronics
  15. nanomedicine
  16. nanophotonics
  17. nano-transistors
  18. nanowires
  19. NEGF
  20. quantum dots
  21. research seminar
  22. SURI
  23. tutorial
  24. uIllinois
  25. uiuc

Other

Trouble Report

For immediate assistance browse through our support center. You can find answers to many questions in just a few minutes.

If still experiencing problems, send us a report.

Sending report ...

Molecular Conduction Workshop 2007

MCW07 Electronic Level Alignment at Metal-Molecule Contacts with a GW Approach

This resource has a 6.4 Ranking

Ranking is calculated from a formula comprised of user reviews and usage statistics. Learn more ›

Usage Stats
Last 12 Months: updated 01 Jul, 2008
Users: 40
Reviews & Citations
Google/IEEE
Avg. Review: 0.0 out of 5 stars
Citations: 0

40 users

0 reviews (Review this)

0 citations

View Presentation

Supporting Documents

Contributor(s) Jeffrey B. Neaton
Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Abstract

Most recent theoretical studies of electron transport in single-molecule junctions rely on a Landauer approach, simplified to treat electron-electron interactions at a mean-field level within density functional theory (DFT). While this framework has proven relatively accurate for certain systems, such as metallic point contacts, the computed conductance often substantially exceeds the measured values for organic molecules. This disagreement has raised questions about the validity of static DFT, inherently a ground state theory, for computing electronic transport properties.

Fundamentally, charge transport through metal-molecule junctions is determined by the electronic coupling of frontier molecular orbitals to extended states in the metal, and their energetic position relative to the Fermi energy. However, frontier molecular levels correspond to electron removal (ionization) and addition (affinity) energies, neither of which can be well described by orbital energies computed with DFT.

Here I will discuss the use of an established, first-principles many-electron self-energy approach, within the GW approximation, to study the impact of correlation on electronic level alignment at physisorbed metal-organic interfaces. I will initially describe results for benzene on graphite, a prototype physisorbed metal-molecule contact for which surface polarization effects are found to drastically modify frontier orbital energies [1]. From these results, a model correlation correction to static DFT resonance energies is developed for weakly-coupled molecular junctions, and then shown to reconcile the conductance of benzenediamine-Au junctions, where the average computed value [2] was found to be about seven times larger than experiment [3].

Biography Jeffrey B. Neaton leads the Theory group at the Molecular Foundry in LBNL. Jeff received his Ph.D. in Physics from Cornell University in 2000, under the guidance of Neil W. Ashcroft. After a departmental postdoc in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at Rutgers University, he joined the Molecular Foundry at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in 2003. His current research interests center on computational nanoscience, in particular the development and application of methods for calculating the structural, spectroscopic, and transport properties of inorganic and molecular nanostructures, particularly at interfaces and contacts. Present areas of interest include the electronic properties of the metal-organic interface, hybrid silicon-organic interfaces, and single-molecule junctions; self-assembly; nanoparticle assemblies; photovoltaics; hydrogen storage; ultrathin epitaxial films of transition metal oxides, such as ferroelectrics and multiferroics; and structural and electronic phases of light elements under pressure.
References
  1. J. B. Neaton, M. S. Hybertsen, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 216405 (2006).
  2. S. Y. Quek, L. Venkataraman, H. J. Choi, S. G. Louie, M. S. Hybertsen, and J. B. Neaton, submitted (2007).
  3. L. Venkataraman, J. E. Klare, C. Nuckolls, M. S. Hybertsen, and M. L. Steigerwald, Nature 442, 904 (2006).
Cite this work

If you reference this work in a publication, please cite as follows:

  • Neaton, Jeffrey B. (2007), "MCW07 Electronic Level Alignment at Metal-Molecule Contacts with a GW Approach," https://www.nanohub.org/resources/3094/.

    BibTex | EndNote

Date posted 05 Sep, 2007
Time 04:00 PM, July 19, 2007
Location Burton Morgan Building, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Type Online Presentations
Tags

Citations

The following are publications that have cited this resource, separated by their affiliation to the NCN.

No citations found.

Reviews

The following are reviews of this resource from other site members.

Write a review

No reviews found. Be the first to review this resource!

See also

The following are resources that may cover similar or related topics.

  • 0.0 Ranking Workshops Part of: Molecular Conduction Workshop 2007

    Molecular Conduction Workshop 2007

    Type Workshops
    Date 02 May, 2007
    Avg. Rating 0.0 out of 5 stars  (0)
    Rate this

    This is the 5th in a series of annual workshops on Molecular Conduction – the prior workshops have been in W. Lafayette (2003, 2005), Evanston (2004) and Virginia (2006). The workshop has been an informal and open venue for discussing new results and key challenges. Two years ago, we expanded the …

People who looked at this also looked at:

Network Recommendations powered by CIKNOW developed by the Science of Networks in Communities Research (SONIC) group at Northwestern University.

Recommendations will load momentarily. If you do not see content change after 30 seconds, there may be a number of reasons:

  • You have javascript turned off in your browser.
  • You have browser incapable of handling the scripts that load the recommendations.
  • There is a problem with the recommendation service and it failed to respond.